http://online.wsj.com/articles/three-signs-that-point-to-a-stock-market-tumble-ahead-1406913915
Mark Hulbert's analysis was posted on internet Aug. 1, 2014 1:25 p.m. ET
and was printed on page B7 of the Wall Street Journal August 2, 2014. Over the past 45 years, the stock market has
lost more than 20% each time three warning signs of Mark Hulbert flashed
simultaneously and all three were flashing August 1, 2014. The signals are measures of excessive levels
of bullishness and enthusiasm; significant stock overvaluation, based
price/earnings ratios; and extreme divergences in the performances of different
market sectors.
A bear market is considered a selloff of at least 20%. Hayes Martin’s research as president of
Market Extremes, an investment consulting firm in New York finds that the indicators have gone
off in unison six times since 1970. The
S&P 500's average subsequent decline on those earlier occasions was 38%,
with the smallest drop being 22%. In fact, no bear market has occurred without
these three signs flashing at the same time. Once they do, the average length
of time to the beginning of a decline is about one month, according to Mr.
Martin.
The first two of these three market indicators the
percentage of advisers who described themselves as bullish rose above 60%, a
level Investors Intelligence, an investment service, considers "danger
territory." Its latest reading, as of Wednesday, was 56%.
The price/earnings ratio for the Russell 2000 index of
smaller-cap stocks, after excluding negative earnings, rose to its highest
level since the benchmark was created in 1984—even higher than at the October
2007 bull-market high or the March 2000 top of the Internet bubble.
The third of Mr. Martin's trio of bearish omens, the
fraction of stocks participating in the bull market, declined markedly. One measure of this waning participation is
the percentage of stocks trading above an average of their prices over the
previous four weeks. Among stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange, this
proportion fell from 82% at the beginning of July to 50% on the day the S&P
500 hit its all-time high.
Mr. Martin said it was one of the sharpest breakdowns in
market breadth that has ever seen in so short a period of time. Another sign of diverging market sectors:
When the was the S&P 500 hitting its closing high ahead 1.4% for the month on
July 24, in contrast to a 3.1% decline for the Russell 2000.
Mr. Martin's said stocks with smaller market capitalizations
will be the hardest hit and forecasts that the Russell 2000 will fall by as
much as 30%. Among the hardest-hit
stocks during a decline will be those with the highest "betas”
semiconductors in particular—and technology stocks generally.
What to do? We have
already gotten out and have a small amount invested in gold silver stocks. We anticipate an additional 5% drop within a
week or two and a recovery of most of the loss as the FED talks about attempts to
calm the markets. Some stock short term buying opportunities may
occur initially. Then an initial FED talked-up recovery may be another
opportunity to get completely out of the market.
However, because hedge funds covered so much of their short
selling we expect renewed short selling and other dumping of stocks will
trigger a classic bear market that will run its course over several
months. And since stocks will be beaten
down, corporations will use the next quarterly reports to acknowledge all the
hidden losses they have been carrying due to pressure by Jim Cramer type
analysts who punish bad news during bull markets and punish fudged profits and
revenue in bear markets. Deceptive
optimistic bookkeeping during bear markets are often treated as criminal by
irate stock holders and regulators so that bear markets are when the companies
will take all possible loses hidden by LIFO vs. FIFO bookkeeping and “creative”
accounting. That is why the stock market
is such a good forecaster of the economy.
Bear markets cause belt tightening and a general economic slowdown. Bull markets generate cash which can be used
for growth if there is confidence in national leaders and economic policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment